I didn’t see a single thing in this article that described what a primary used case would be for abortion, like for example, if the woman is raped. Something that is irrefutable under any circumstances unless of course she waits longer than a set time (eg 3 months). And is that different from a scenario where she is using abortion as birth control? Should these be treated differently?

These cases should certainly be considered separately because the argument with other people is irrefutable in one case, but not necessarily in the other.

Once you straighten that out, then you can discuss how the policy can actually be applied and what is realistic. For example, can you really require somebody to prove that they got raped in order to get an abortion? Is it even practical to put a limit on the number of abortions that you can get?

You could argue till you’re blue in the face about the theories on when life begins, but these practical issues take precedent .